In re T.K.
Ohio Supreme Court
109 Ohio St. 3d 512 (2006)
- Written by Sharon Feldman, JD
Facts
Members of a gang stopped in front of a home where a family had gathered for a birthday celebration. The gang was searching for someone who had been involved in an argument with a gang member. According to witnesses, a handgun was passed among the gang members, and T.K. (defendant), a minor, was heard shouting, “Shoot” and “Shoot the [expletive].” Shots were fired, and three people were injured. T.K. was found to be delinquent by having committed what would be felonious assault and aggravated riot if committed by an adult. The court found that T.K. knew someone had a gun, he intended that someone act on T.K.’s words, and, although it was unclear which victim T.K. intended to target, the state (plaintiff) had sufficiently shown transferred intent. The court of appeals affirmed the conviction for aggravated riot but reversed the felonious-assault convictions because the testimony at trial was so conflicting that it was impossible to identify the principal or the intended target. The state appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Resnick, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
