In re T.L. Fowler, Minor

2016 WL 6106486 (2016)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re T.L. Fowler, Minor

Michigan Court of Appeals
2016 WL 6106486 (2016)

Facts

The State of Michigan (the state) (plaintiff) initiated proceedings to terminate Fowler’s (defendant) parental rights because Fowler had failed to provide adequate housing for his child, his income was inadequate to support his child, and because he used marijuana. While the matter was pending, Fowler obtained employment and suitable housing. Fowler’s marijuana use was the only statutory condition for termination of parental rights that continued to exist at the time of Fowler’s termination hearing. However, Fowler had a valid medical-marijuana card permitting him to use medical marijuana under Michigan law. At Fowler’s termination hearing, witnesses for the state testified that Fowler’s marijuana use presented a risk of harm to his child because (1) the effects of marijuana were unknown, (2) marijuana use was normally illegal, and (3) unsavory people were involved in the business of dealing drugs. The trial court terminated Fowler’s parental rights without making a specific finding concerning whether Fowler’s marijuana use presented an unreasonable danger to his child. Fowler appealed to the Michigan Court of Appeals.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership