In re Taira Lynn Marine Ltd. No. 5, LLC v. Jays Seafood, Inc.

444 F.3d 371 (2006)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Taira Lynn Marine Ltd. No. 5, LLC v. Jays Seafood, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
444 F.3d 371 (2006)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

The Barry, a barge that was carrying gaseous propylene/propane cargo and being pulled by the Kirby, a tugboat, ran into the Louisa Bridge in Louisiana. When the allision occurred, the gaseous cargo on the Barry discharged into the air, and Louisiana state police ordered a mandatory evacuation of all business and residences within a certain vicinity of the bridge. Taira Lynn Marine, Inc. (Taira Lynn) (plaintiff) owned and operated the Kirby. Taira Lynn initiated a federal action to resolve damage claims against Taira Lynn, the barge owner, and the state (collectively, the respondents). Hundreds of claims were filed. A group of 14 businesses (the claimants) (defendants) filed claims under general maritime negligence law, state law, and certain federal statutes. Most of the claimants did not claim any physical property damage due to the allision but asserted that they had lost work, sales, and/or revenues as a result of the evacuation. A few claimants asserted that the discharged gases that reached their property constituted physical damage. Mason Seafood (Mason) (defendant) claimed to have suffered property damage to the extent that 88 boxes of crabs spoiled in a freezer when law enforcement shut off the electricity during the evacuation. Advanced Materials (defendant) claimed property damage insofar as it lost certain chemical materials when it had to prematurely terminate its manufacturing process after the allision and could not sell its chemical products. On motions for partial summary judgment, the respondents argued that the claimants were barred from recovery because the claimants suffered economic losses unaccompanied by physical injury. The district court denied the motions. The respondents appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Stewart, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership