In re Tavian B.
Nebraska Supreme Court
292 Neb. 804 (2016)
- Written by Meredith Hamilton Alley, JD
Facts
The juvenile court of Lancaster County, Nebraska, found that Tavian B. lacked proper parental care. The state (plaintiff) moved to terminate the parental rights of Tavian’s mother and father (defendants). The father moved to transfer jurisdiction to the Oglala Sioux Tribal Juvenile Court, which was recognized under the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) as a tribal court. Under ICWA, a child’s parent, custodian, or tribe could petition the state court that was overseeing proceedings for termination of parental rights or foster-care placement from state court to tribal court. ICWA required transfer unless good cause was shown for the state court to retain jurisdiction. The Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) promulgated guidelines used when federal agencies and courts needed clarification on the interpretation of ICWA. At the time that the juvenile court was considering the father’s transfer motion, the BIA guidelines stated that good cause to retain jurisdiction might exist if the proceedings had reached an advanced stage of litigation. The state argued that because the proceedings were at an advanced stage when the father filed the transfer motion, there was good cause for the state court to retain jurisdiction. Before the transfer hearing, the state withdrew its motion to terminate parental rights. The juvenile court considered the filing of a motion to terminate parental rights to have marked the beginning of an advanced stage of litigation and denied the father’s motion. The father appealed. While the appeal was pending, the BIA guidelines were amended to state that a late stage of litigation should not be a factor in weighing a transfer motion.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wright, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Stacy, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.