In re Taxotere (Docetaxel) Products Liability Litigation

966 F.3d 351 (2020)

From our private database of 46,600+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Taxotere (Docetaxel) Products Liability Litigation

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
966 F.3d 351 (2020)

  • Written by Liz Nakamura, JD

Facts

Dorothy Kuykendall (plaintiff) sued Accord Healthcare, Inc. (Accord) (defendant) alleging that Accord knowingly failed to warn users that its prescription chemotherapy drug Taxotere could cause permanent hair loss. Across the United States, there were approximately 12,000 similar cases pending against Accord, all of which were consolidated in the Eastern District of Louisiana. As part of the multidistrict litigation (MDL) discovery management and streamlining process, the district judge ordered all 12,000 consolidated plaintiffs to complete and submit a plaintiff fact sheet (PFS) within 75 days. The PFS included detailed biographical and medical questions necessary to properly address each claim. If a consolidated plaintiff failed to submit their PFS within the deadline, that plaintiff was entitled to two additional 30-day extensions, each preceded by a required notice of deficiency from Accord. If both 30-day extensions expired without compliance, then the noncompliant consolidated plaintiff would need to justify their noncompliance at a hearing, or their case would be dismissed. Kuykendall failed to submit a timely PFS and was ultimately ordered to appear for a hearing. Because of a court delay, Kuykendall’s case was heard one week after her original hearing date. Between the original hearing date and the adjourn date, Kuykendall submitted a substantially incomplete PFS. The missing information was readily available to Kuykendall, and the court could not move her case forward without it. The court then gave Kuykendall 30 additional days to submit a complete PFS. Kuykendall failed to cure the identified PFS deficiencies within the deadline, and the court dismissed her case with prejudice. After the dismissal, Kuykendall submitted an amended, but still incomplete, PFS along with a letter asking that the dismissal be reconsidered because she was unaware her PFS had been deficient. The district court upheld the dismissal, finding that Kuykendall willfully failed to comply with discovery disclosure requirements. Kuykendall appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Higginson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 834,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,600 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,600 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership