In re Taylor

599 F.3d 880 (2010)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Taylor

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
599 F.3d 880 (2010)

Facts

About one month before filing for Chapter 7 bankruptcy, David and Linda Taylor (debtors) purchased a car using $18,020 borrowed from USAA Federal Savings Bank (USAA) (creditor). The Taylors gave USAA a security interest in the car. USAA perfected its security interest 21 days after the Taylors’ car purchase, which was timely under state law. However, under the Bankruptcy Code, creditors were required to perfect their security interests within 20 days. Because USAA had perfected outside the 20-day period and the Taylors had declared bankruptcy within 90 days of the transfer, the bankruptcy trustee sought to avoid the transfer of the security interest as a preferential transfer under 11 U.S.C. § 547(b). The bankruptcy court held that the transfer was avoidable. In deciding the appropriate remedy, the bankruptcy court concluded that cancelling the security interest or transferring the security interest to the trustee would be insufficient. Instead, the court decided to award the bankruptcy estate the value of the security interest, which the court determined to be the initial loan amount of $18,020. The bankruptcy court reasoned that if USAA’s security interest was invalid, the Taylors could have obtained another $18,020 loan from another lender in exchange for transferring the security interest in the car to that lender. The bankruptcy court thus ordered USAA to pay the estate $18,020, plus interest, but gave USAA the right to file an unsecured claim against the estate for the same amount. The bankruptcy appellate panel affirmed, and USAA appealed to the Ninth Circuit, challenging the remedy awarded by the bankruptcy court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bea, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 802,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership