In re Texas Rangers Baseball Partners

434 B.R. 393 (2010)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Texas Rangers Baseball Partners

United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas
434 B.R. 393 (2010)

Facts

Thomas Hicks owned Hicks Sports Group (HSG), which in turn owned two partnerships: the Rangers Equity Holding General Partnership (REHGP) and the Rangers Equity Holding Limited Partnership (REHLP). REHPG and REHLP, in turn, owned the Texas Rangers Baseball Partners (TRBP) (debtor) and thus the Texas Rangers baseball team. HSG borrowed $525 million from a group of lenders that included JPMorgan (the lenders) (creditors). HSG defaulted. TRBP received a third-lien bridge loan from the Major League Baseball (MLB) organization on the condition that the team be put up for sale. Star pitcher Nolan Ryan was mistakenly named the winner of the resulting auction. Although Hicks was determined to sell the team to Ryan, the lenders were equally determined to veto the sale—as was their right under a pledge agreement—in hopes of obtaining a higher price in a new auction. TRBP filed for bankruptcy with a prepackaged plan under which the lenders were supposedly not impaired, thus making their consent irrelevant because unimpaired creditors were automatically deemed to have accepted the plan. The lenders claimed that they were impaired because their contractual right to veto the sale was denied. Meanwhile, the lenders filed involuntary bankruptcy petitions against REHGP and REHLP, triggering fiduciary duties owed to creditors in bankruptcy. Some modifications were made to the plan with regard to interest payments.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lynn, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership