Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

In re The Estate of Michael Patrick Smith v. Heckler

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
747 F.2d 583 (1984)


Facts

The Estate of Michael Patrick Smith (the Estate) (plaintiff) brought a class action suit against Heckler, the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) (defendant). The suit was brought on behalf of Medicaid recipients residing in Colorado nursing homes. The Estate alleged that Heckler had a statutory duty under the Medicaid Act to develop and implement a compliance review and enforcement mechanism to ensure that residents in Medicaid-certified nursing homes received quality health care. The Estate argued that Heckler did not meet the statutory mandate because the enforcement system was “facility-oriented,” instead of “patient-oriented.” The Medicaid Act gives the HHS Secretary the authority to make an independent determination of whether the facility is compliant separate from any state determination. The Estate argued that the Heckler’s method of review evaluated only the physical facilities providing the care and did not adequately determine the quality of care delivered to residents. The district court held that Hecker’s decision not to use a “patient-oriented” system was not a violation of the Secretary’s statutory duty and found that the State of Colorado would have been the proper defendant because it was responsible for developing and enforcing standards to ensure quality resident care. The Estate appealed the district court’s decision.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (McKay, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 200,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.