In re the Exxon Valdez
United States District Court for the District of Alaska
296 F. Supp. 2d 1071 (2004)

- Written by Alex Ruskell, JD
Facts
The Exxon Valdez, an oil tanker owned by Exxon Shipping (Exxon) (defendant), ran aground in Prince William Sound, Alaska, and spilled 11 million gallons of oil. The cause of the wreck was human error, namely that of the captain, an alcoholic who was drinking at the time of the crash. Exxon knew the captain was an alcoholic but let him sail anyway. The best estimate of the actual harm caused by the spill was over $500 million in damages to 32,677 claimants. Much litigation followed, including a punitive-damages award against Exxon for $5 billion. Exxon appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, arguing that the punitive-damages award was so high that it violated Exxon’s Fourteenth Amendment due-process rights. The appeals court ordered that the punitive-damages award be reduced, and the district court reduced the award to $4 billion. Exxon appealed again, and the appeals court vacated the punitive-damages award and remanded the case to the district court to once again determine the lawfulness of the $5 billion punitive-damages award.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Holland, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.