In re the Marriage of McCord

910 P.2d 85 (1995)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re the Marriage of McCord

Colorado Court of Appeals
910 P.2d 85 (1995)

  • Written by Haley Gintis, JD

Facts

In 1988, David L. McCord (defendant) and Deborah A. McCord (plaintiff) divorced. David was ordered to pay $300 per month in child support based on his $16,400 yearly salary as a construction worker. In 1994, David won $2 million in a state lottery and immediately quit his job. Deborah filed for a child-support modification on the ground that David’s sudden increase in income constituted a change of circumstance. The district court held a hearing on the matter. The district court concluded that David’s lottery winnings constituted income for a child-support-obligation calculation. The district court also found that because David had voluntarily quit his job, the income he had previously made should be calculated into the child-support-obligation award. Based on the new child-support-obligation calculation, David was ordered to pay $781 per month. David appealed on the ground that Deborah did not show that the child had an increased economic need in order to support the modification. David also appealed on the ground that the trial court erred in including the income he made as a construction worker because he had testified that he was forced to quit his job because of an injury that occurred one year prior to his winning the lottery. The Colorado Court of Appeals reviewed the case.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Metzger, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership