In re the Marriage of Witten
Supreme Court of Iowa
672 N.W.2d 768 (2003)
- Written by Zachary Linowitz, JD
Facts
Before Tamera Witten (plaintiff) and Trip Witten (defendant) sought to have their marriage dissolved, the couple had attempted to become parents through the process of in vitro fertilization. After several unsuccessful embryo transfers, 17 fertilized eggs remained in storage at the medical facility. The Wittens had signed an embryo storage agreement that provided that embryos will not be used for transfer, release, or disposition without the signed approval of both parties. Upon the dissolution of the marriage, Tamera asked at trial that she be awarded “custody” of the 17 embryos. Trip did not want Tamera to use the embryos and asked the court to prohibit either party from doing so without the written consent of both parties. The district court relied on the embryo storage agreement to settle the dispute and enjoined either party from transferring, releasing, or utilizing the embryos without the written consent of the other. Tamera appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ternus, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 778,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.