Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

In re the Welfare of J.H.

Supreme Court of Minnesota
844 N.W.2d 28 (Minn. 2014)


Facts

G. K., a minor, was forced from a car, thrown down on a mattress, held down by a number of gang members, and raped. J. H. (defendant) was in the room when the rape occurred. J. H. was 17 years old. Under Minnesota law, when determining whether a minor will be certified as an adult for trial, a juvenile court must determine whether public safety will be served by such certification, using six factors: (1) the seriousness of the offense, (2) the culpability of the child, (3) the child’s prior record of delinquency, (4) the child’s history of participating and being willing to participate in available programming designed to meet his behavioral needs, (5) the adequacy of such programming or the punishment available in the juvenile system, and (6) the dispositional options of the child (e.g., standing trial as an adult or being kept in the juvenile system). The juvenile court issued an order certifying J. H. to be tried as an adult. The juvenile court found that all factors favored certification as an adult, except for J. H.’s lack of prior record. The juvenile court’s order explained its findings on each of the six factors and stated that it gave greater weight to the seriousness of the offense and J. H.’s lack of prior record, as was required under Minnesota law. The court of appeals reversed, finding that the district court gave too much weight to the seriousness of the offense and not enough weight to J. H.’s lack of prior record. The state appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Dietzen, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 217,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.