In re Three Buoys Houseboat Vacations U.S.A., Ltd.
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
921 F.2d 775, 1991 AMC 1356 (1990)
- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
The Lake of the Ozarks is a large lake located entirely within the state of Missouri. The lake supports boat traffic, but a large dam blocks any vessel from navigating out of the lake into the Osage River. Three Buoys Houseboat Vacations U.S.A., Ltd. (Three Buoys) (defendant) offered chartered houseboats on the lake. In August 1987, a service vessel belonging to Three Buoys was sent out on the lake to perform a service call for one of its charters. The service vessel struck a houseboat that had not been chartered from Three Buoys. Two passengers on that houseboat were killed, three other passengers and a Three Buoys employee were injured, and the service vessel sank. A number of the victims of the accident (the victims) (plaintiffs) brought wrongful-death, personal-injury, and property-damage claims against Three Buoys in Missouri state courts. Three Buoys sought to avoid full liability for these claims by petitioning the federal district court for the protections of the Limitation of Liability Act, 46 U.S.C. § 181, a federal statute that limits liability for the operator of a vessel in maritime accidents to the amount of the salvage value of that vessel. The Limitation of Liability Act only applies to claims arising on navigable waters, however. The district court held that the Lake of the Ozarks was not navigable and that Three Buoys had not stated a claim. Three Buoys appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gibson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.