In re TMI Litigation Governmental Entities Claims
United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
544 F. Supp. 853 (1982)
- Written by Ross Sewell, JD
Facts
The 1979 nuclear reactor accident at Three Mile Island Reactor No. 2 (TMI) (defendant) near Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, created numerous pending lawsuits based on negligence and strict liability. Some of these cases were consolidated for pretrial disposition under the heading Governmental Entities Claims. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, two municipalities, and a class of all other Pennsylvania local municipalities within a 100-mile radius of Three Mile Island (collectively, the government entities) (plaintiffs) sought the following damages incurred for responding to the nuclear incident: (1) overtime, compensatory time, and other personnel costs; (2) operational expenses and emergency purchases; (3) lost work time; and (4) other expenses. The government entities did not allege that any of the costs or expenses were incurred to protect government property from threatened physical harm, and there were no allegations that any of the costs or expenses were incurred restoring or repairing government property. The government entities argued that a nuclear-power accident was a unique emergency, calling for different rules from those developed to deal with everyday occurrences such as fires. TMI, companies involved in designing and constructing the reactor, and a company that maintained the reactor (defendants) argued policy considerations barred recovery in tort for purely economic losses and filed a motion for summary judgment.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Rambo, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.