In re Ty M.

655 N.W.2d 672 (2003)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Ty M.

Nebraska Supreme Court
655 N.W.2d 672 (2003)

RW

Facts

The Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) of the state of Nebraska (plaintiff) found one-year-old Ty M. and his baby brother, Devon M., living in dangerously filthy conditions with their parents, Shawn and Holly M. (defendants). The DHHS took the children into custody. Domestic squalor proved to be merely one symptom of the parents’ broader dysfunctionality. Over the next three years, and under a juvenile court’s supervision, the DHHS devoted resources worth over $111,000 to counsel Shawn and Holly and to help them acquire some basic family-management skills. The DHHS gave each parent a set of court-approved goals to test their progress in developing those skills. Neither Shawn nor Holly did very well in meeting those goals, and they gave no other evidence of their readiness to handle the demands of family life. Eventually, the state petitioned the juvenile court to terminate Shawn’s and Holly’s parental rights. The court found that, given the parents’ deficiencies and the failure of the state’s reasonable efforts to rehabilitate and reunite the family, termination would be in the children’s best interests. After the court granted the state’s petition, Shawn and Holly appealed to the Nebraska Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wright, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership