In re U.S. Office of Personnel Management Data Security Breach Litigation
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
928 F.3d 42 (2019)

- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
The United States Office of Personnel Management (OPM) (defendant) was the federal government’s human-resources agency. OPM suffered data breaches in 2009 and 2012. Around this time period, OPM’s inspector general issued audit reports warning OPM about several problems with its information security. At one point, the inspector general recommended that OPM shut down its systems until greater security could be added. Despite these warnings and the recommendation, OPM carried forward with the status quo. In 2014, OPM was hit with another cyberattack, resulting in, according to several past and present employees and prospective employees (collectively, the employees) (plaintiffs), the theft of personal information of millions of past, present, and prospective employees. The information included Social Security numbers, birthdates, fingerprints, and information collected in prospective employees’ background checks. The employees sued OPM under the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a (the act). The employees alleged that as a result of the data breach, they had had fraudulent accounts opened in their names, false tax returns filed, and unauthorized purchases made in their names, and in many cases had incurred legal fees resulting from these occurrences. The employees also alleged that many of them had incurred costs to buy credit-protection services. OPM argued that it had sovereign immunity and thus was not subject to liability.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.