In Re Verizon Internet
United States District Court for the District of Columbia
257 F. Supp. 2d 244 (2003)
The Recording Industry Association of America (plaintiff) issued a subpoena to Verizon Internet Services (Verizon) (defendant), seeking the identities of anonymous users who allegedly infringed copyrights by offering songs for downloading on the Internet. The Recording Industry Association of America cited §512 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) as the authority for the subpoena request. Verizon sought to quash the subpoena, arguing that the subpoena authority in §512 of the DMCA was a violation of the Internet users’ First Amendment rights. Verizon also argued that the subpoena itself was overbroad and encompassed protected expression. Specifically, Verizon contended that the subpoena did not provide sufficient procedural protection for expressive rights.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Bates, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.