In re Vincent

143 N.M. 56 (2007)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Vincent

Supreme Court of New Mexico
143 N.M. 56 (2007)

  • Written by Casey Cohen, JD

Facts

Magistrate Judge William Vincent Jr. (defendant) publicly endorsed Bill Standley in a local newspaper for election as mayor. The endorsement listed Judge Vincent’s name as a supporter of Standley, but did not mention that Judge Vincent was a magistrate court judge. The Judicial Standards Commission (Commission) filed a petition for discipline against Judge Vincent, alleging that he had violated provisions of New Mexico’s Code of Judicial Conduct (Code) by publicly endorsing Standley for mayor in a newspaper. Specifically, the Commission pointed to Rule 21-700(A)(3)(b) of the Code, referred to as the endorsement clause, which provided that a judge was not allowed to publicly endorse or oppose a candidate for public office. Judge Vincent admitted that he had endorsed a candidate for public office. However, Judge Vincent contested any discipline, arguing that his endorsement was constitutionally protected free speech and that the endorsement clause violated the First Amendment.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per Curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership