From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...
In re Water Use Permit Applications
Supreme Court of Hawaii
9 P.3d 409 (2000)
In 1916, the Oahu Sugar Company constructed an irrigation ditch to divert freshwater from the Ko’olau mountain range. As a result, the ecosystem of Kane-ohe Bay was damaged. In 1992, the Commission on Water Resource Management (Commission) required permits to use the water from the ditch. In 1993, the sugar company announced that it would cease operations, resulting in a number of entities vying for rights to use the water. These entities also petitioned the commission to amend the flow standards. The commission determined that the groundwater and streams of Kane’ohe Bay and the bay itself were part of the public trust and that resource protection was a “categorical imperative and the precondition to all subsequent considerations.”
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Nakayama, J.)
Dissent (Ramil, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 217,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.