In re Waterson, Berlin & Snyder Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
48 F.2d 704 (1931)
- Written by Katrina Sumner, JD
Facts
In 1929 a music publisher, Waterson, Berlin, and Snyder Company filed for bankruptcy at a time when the company was under contract with 22 composers (plaintiffs) to publish their songs and provide them with royalties. Under the contract, the composers’ assignments of their songs to the music publisher were absolute, granting the company title to work the copyrights. Under the agreement, the composers were to receive a third of the revenue minus costs from mechanical reproductions and a penny for each song sold. About one month after the composers were due to receive royalties, the music publisher filed for bankruptcy. The bankruptcy trustee (defendant) decided to sell the copyrights and invited bids with notice to potential buyers that the buyers could purchase the songs without being subject to royalty claims. The composers filed a petition seeking to have the district court either require the bankruptcy trustee to assign the copyrights to the songs back to the composers or to sell the copyrights subject to the composers’ royalty claims. The district court granted the composers rescission of the contract and instructed the bankruptcy trustee to assign the copyrights back to the composers. The composers were required to return any advance royalties they may have received. The bankruptcy trustee appealed, raising questions as to whether the trustee was permitted to sell the copyrights and whether buyers could purchase them subject to royalty claims.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (A. Hand, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 783,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.