In re Weisman
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
5 F.3d 417 (1993)
The Peters couple divorced in 1985. The ex-wife remarried, changed her name to Sheila Weisman, and never again lived in the family house. Marc Peters (defendant), the ex-husband, married Nianne Neergaard, and thereafter he and Neergaard openly occupied the Peters house. The Peters' divorce settlement left record ownership of the house with both Weisman and Peters, as tenants in common. Weisman deeded her interest to Peters in 1986, but the deed had still not been recorded in 1988, when Weisman and her second husband filed for bankruptcy. The bankruptcy trustee, Jerome Robertson (plaintiff), filed a complaint against Peters to avoid the 1986 conveyance. The federal bankruptcy judge ruled for Peters, but the district court reversed for clear error. Peters appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Reinhardt, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 684,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 684,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 42,700 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.