Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

In re Wells Fargo Home Mortgage Overtime Pay Litigation

United States District Court for the Northern District of California
527 F.Supp. 2d 1053 (N.D. Cal. 2007)


The plaintiffs in this case, all current and former employees of Wells Fargo Home Mortgage (Wells Fargo) (defendant) and all non-California residents, brought suit against Wells Fargo, alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and California’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL). The employees, who worked as Home Mortgage Consultants (HMCs) for Wells Fargo, sought to certify two classes pursuant to FRCP 23: one for plaintiffs who brought claims under the UCL, and one for plaintiffs who wished to opt in to a suit alleging FLSA violations. Wells Fargo attacked the class certification, arguing that: (1) the declarations were so similar that they likely did not accurately reflect the experiences of the individual plaintiffs; (2) the seventeen declarations submitted by the plaintiffs to support the class certification were largely from two Midwest branches and did not represent the 1,600 nationwide offices; (3) six of the plaintiffs worked in a temporary refinance office that was not representative of other Wells Fargo offices; and (4) most HMCs preferred the current commission system and would not benefit from a class action. The court was required to determine whether the class could be properly certified.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.


The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Patel, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 222,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.