Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

In re World Auxiliary Power Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
303 F.3d 1120 (2002)


Facts

World Auxiliary Power (WAP) and two related corporations owned copyrights in drawings, technical manuals, blueprints, and software used to make modifications to airplanes. These companies obtained financing from Silicon Valley Bank (Silicon Valley), which was secured by all of the companies’ assets, including the copyrights. Silicon Valley filed a financing statement, recording this security interest with the California Secretary of State. The companies did not register any of the copyrights with the United States Copyright Office. WAP and the other companies separately filed for bankruptcy simultaneously. Through a series of transactions, Aerocon Engineering (Aerocon) and Airweld purchased the copyrights and the right of the bankruptcy trustee to sue to avoid Silicon Valley’s security interest as tenants in common. The relationship between Airweld and Aerocon dissolved, and Aerocon filed an adversary proceeding in the bankruptcy to avoid the security interest of Silicon Valley, which had been transferred to Airweld after a foreclosure and a series of sales. The bankruptcy court determined that Silicon Valley had perfected its security interest and granted summary judgment to Silicon Valley. Aerocon appealed to the district court, which affirmed the decision of the bankruptcy court. Aerocon then appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Kleinfeld, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.