In Re Yellowstone Mountain Club, LLC

2009 WL 3094930 [Vacated, 2009 WL 10624435] (2009)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In Re Yellowstone Mountain Club, LLC

United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Montana
2009 WL 3094930 [Vacated, 2009 WL 10624435] (2009)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD

Facts

Real estate developer Tim Blixseth amassed 13,500 acres near Yellowstone National Park to build an exclusive master-planned ski and golf resort called Yellowstone Mountain Club. Blixseth and his former wife, Edra, formed corporations (debtors) that developed the resort. Blixseth controlled the corporations through his holding company, Blixseth Group Inc. (BGI), which was the corporations’ sole Class A shareholder. When Credit Suisse marketed a new syndicated loan product to master-planned communities that allowed equity holders to take sizeable distributions from loan proceeds, Blixseth borrowed $375 million, paying Credit Suisse a 2 percent, $7.5 million transaction fee. The club had previously carried at most $60 million in debt, owed only $20 million at the time, and had experienced negative cash flows. Credit Suisse did some due diligence but never requested audited financial statements and instead relied on projections Blixseth provided that did not match historical performance. The credit agreement specified that $209 million would be used as “distributions or loans” for “purposes unrelated” to the club. The same day Credit Suisse funded the loan, Blixseth transferred $209 million out of the club to BGI, reflected as a journal entry on the books without contemporaneous loan documents. After shareholders threatened to sue, Blixseth drafted and backdated a two-page demand note. Meanwhile, $209 million went to accounts and payoffs that benefited Blixseth and Edra personally. Blixseth said he always intended to repay the money, but Edra testified otherwise. The development corporations filed under Chapter 11 and proposed a reorganization plan that would pay members’ claims. Lenders who provided debtor-in-possession financing and unsecured creditors requested equitable subordination of Credit Suisse’s claim.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kirscher, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership