In the Interest of N.I.V.S. and M.C.V.S., Minor Children

2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 2282, 2015 WL 1120913 (2015)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In the Interest of N.I.V.S. and M.C.V.S., Minor Children

Texas Court of Appeals
2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 2282, 2015 WL 1120913 (2015)

  • Written by Mike Begovic, JD

Facts

Dino Villarreal (plaintiff), a transgender man, was in a relationship with Sandra Sandoval (defendant). In 2002 Sandoval adopted N.I.V.S. and, two years later, M.C.V.S., both as newborns, while living with Villarreal. For seven years, Villarreal, Sandoval, N.I.V.S., and M.C.V.S. lived together as a family, with Villarreal being known as the father. The children were unaware of Villarreal’s status as a transgender man. In January 2011, Villarreal and Sandoval separated. Villarreal moved out, but he continued to spend time with and care for the children. In November 2013, Sandoval refused Villarreal’s requests to see the children. Shortly thereafter, Villarreal obtained an order changing his name from Diana Villarreal to Dino Villarreal. In December, Villarreal filed numerous petitions, including a petition in suit to adjudicate parentage and a petition seeking his appointment as a co-conservator with equal access. A week later, Villarreal filed a voluntary statement of paternity with the trial court, asserting the children had no other known biological father with legal rights. The trial court granted Villarreal’s temporary order for possession of the children, and the case was reset to January 6, 2014. On January 3, 2014, a court issued Villarreal an order changing his gender identity. Sandoval filed motions to dismiss the suit based on lack of jurisdiction. Villarreal asserted standing under numerous prongs of the Texas Family Code, two of which contained the term man. Section 160.602(a)(3) provided that a paternity suit could be brought by a man whose paternity of the child is to be adjudicated, and § 102.003(a)(8) provided that a suit affecting a parent-child relationship could be filed by a man alleging himself to be the father. Villarreal also alleged standing under various legal doctrines. The trial court granted Sandoval’s motion regarding jurisdiction, finding, in part, that Villarreal did not have standing under § 160.602(a)(3) or § 102.003(a)(8), because he was not a man. Villarreal appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Martinez, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership