In the Matter of Adrian Abramovich, Marketing Strategy Leaders, Inc., and Marketing Leaders, Inc.
Federal Communications Commission
32 F.C.C.R. 5418, 2017 WL 2714972 (2017)
- Written by Heather Whittemore, JD
Facts
Adrian Abramovich (plaintiff) was engaged in a widespread robocalling operation, making almost 100 million calls over three months in 2016. The type of robocalling Abramovich conducted was called neighbor spoofing. Abramovich used fake phone numbers similar to the phone number of the call’s recipient, making the recipient believe she was receiving a phone call from a local caller. Through the robocalls, Abramovich posed as well-known travel companies and offered consumers fraudulent vacation packages. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) was first alerted to Abramovich’s scheme by Spok, Inc., an emergency medical-paging service. Spok’s customers, medical professionals around the country, were receiving numerous calls to their pagers. These calls caused slowdowns and service outages, risking public safety. Travel companies Abramovich was spoofing, such as TripAdvisor, also alerted the FCC as to the scheme. The FCC investigated Abramovich and specifically investigated 80,000 calls. The FCC found that Abramovich’s spoofing scheme had violated the Truth in Caller ID Act and the FCC’s rules. The FCC filed a notice of apparent liability against Abramovich and proposed a $120,000,000 forfeiture.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.