In the Matter of Alexsandr Kogan and Alexander Nix

FTC Docket No. C-4693 and C-4694 (2019)

From our private database of 47,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In the Matter of Alexsandr Kogan and Alexander Nix

Federal Trade Commission
FTC Docket No. C-4693 and C-4694 (2019)

Facts

Researchers at the University of Cambridge developed an algorithm that could predict a person’s personality based on which public pages the person liked on Facebook’s social-media platform. SCL Elections (SCL), working with Cambridge Analytica, LLC (defendant), wanted to harness that research to offer voter profiling, targeting, and other marketing services to political campaigns and commercial clients. They contacted Alexsandr Kogan (defendant), who had an existing Facebook app that could be repurposed to collect profile data from app users and their Facebook friends. Kogan incorporated a new entity, GSR, for the project, with himself as CEO. He reworked and rebranded his existing app to become the GSRApp. SCL, acting on Cambridge Analytica’s behalf, entered an agreement with GSR under which GSR agreed to harvest Facebook data from app users and their friends, generate personality profiles, and match the profiles to voter records. Alexander Nix (defendant) signed the agreement for SCL, regularly communicated with Kogan regarding the project, and provided guidance on the data to be collected. Users for the GRSApp were recruited via survey requests that offered a small fee if a user completed the survey and authorized the app to collect Facebook data. Regarding the authorization, the app expressly represented that it would not download a user’s name or other identifying information but was instead focused only on demographic information and page likes. That representation was false. The app collected users’ Facebook user IDs, gender, birthdate, location, friend lists, and page likes. Additionally, the app harvested the user IDs, names, genders, birthdates, locations, and page likes of each user’s Facebook friends. In total, the project collected profile data from over 250,000 app users and 50 million friends of app users. The parties discontinued the project around May 2015. In December, Cambridge Analytica’s use of Facebook data was reported by news outlets, sparking public outcry. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) (plaintiff) filed a complaint against Kogan individually and against Nix both individually and in his then capacity as CEO of Cambridge Analytica. The FTC alleged that Kogan, Nix, and Cambridge Analytica violated the FTC Act by engaging in a deceptive trade practice. Negotiations resulted in the entry of a consent order agreed to by the parties.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 905,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 905,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,100 briefs, keyed to 995 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 905,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,100 briefs - keyed to 995 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership