In the Matter of Capital Funds, Inc.

File No. 8-10968 (1964)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In the Matter of Capital Funds, Inc.

Securities and Exchange Commission
File No. 8-10968 (1964)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

Austin and Erma Gatlin (the Gatlins) (defendants) were officers, directors, and principal stockholders of Capital Funds, Inc. (Capital) (defendant). Capital applied for registration as a broker-dealer. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) (plaintiff) instituted administrative proceedings to determine whether Capital’s application should be denied or Capital should be permitted to withdraw the application and whether the Gatlins should be found to have caused any denial order. The hearing examiner found that Capital, aided and abetted by the Gatlins, had willfully violated the federal securities laws and recommended denial of the application. After reviewing the record, the SEC found: Capital was a registered broker-dealer in Oklahoma and qualified as a securities dealer in Arkansas; the Gatlins had a controlling interest in Peoples Loan and Investment Co., Inc. (Peoples); Capital shared Peoples’ Arkansas offices; Capital underwrote a public offering of Peoples stock purportedly limited to Arkansas residents; a Capital salesman sold Peoples stock to two Oklahoma residents; the salesman maintained that he subscribed for the shares himself and, after concluding he could not pay for them and speaking with Austin Gatlin, sold the shares to the Oklahoma residents; the salesman did not sign a subscription form, pay for the stock, or receive any stock certificates; an Oklahoma purchaser signed a subscription form, and the Oklahoma purchasers paid Peoples; the stock certificate purportedly issued to the salesman bore a higher number than the certificates issued to the nonresidents who purchased stock later; and Capital sold securities to a Missouri resident and purchased shares from a Texas resident and resold them to Oklahoma residents.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 812,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership