In the Matter of Certain Market Making Activities on Nasdaq

1998 WL 919673 (1998)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In the Matter of Certain Market Making Activities on Nasdaq

Securities and Exchange Commission
1998 WL 919673 (1998)

  • Written by Brett Stavin, JD

Facts

A group of broker-dealers (market makers) (defendants) were registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) (plaintiff) under § 15A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) and acted as market makers in the Nasdaq stock market. In this role, the market makers agreed to purchase and sell securities at prices and quantities listed on Nasdaq’s quotation system, thereby creating liquidity in the market. The market makers were required to provide Nasdaq’s quotation system with the price at which they would buy a particular security, known as the bid price, as well as the price at which they would sell a particular security, known as the ask price. The difference between the highest bid price, known as the inside bid, and the lowest ask price, known as the inside ask, constituted what was known as the inside spread. An SEC investigative report uncovered substantial collusion among the market makers. In some instances, one market maker would ask another market maker to move the quoted bid and ask prices to artificially increase or decrease the price at which the requesting market maker would exchange securities with his customers, to the market maker’s benefit. Additionally, some market makers intentionally delayed reporting transactions to Nasdaq. By delaying the reporting of their trades, the market makers were able to avoid situations in which the prices of securities moved against them. This adversely impacted the effective functioning of the market and advanced the market makers’ pecuniary interests to the detriment of their customers. The SEC brought an administrative enforcement action against the market makers, and the market makers each submitted an offer of settlement.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership