In the Matter of Daiwa Bank, Ltd.
Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System
1995 WL 580439 (1995)
- Written by Steven Pacht, JD
Facts
Daiwa Bank, Ltd. (Daiwa) (defendant) was a Japanese bank that did business in New York. Toshihide Iguchi was a senior employee in Daiwa’s New York branch. Iguchi confessed to Daiwa’s president that over an 11-year period, Iguchi (1) engaged in the unauthorized trading of United States Treasury securities, (2) misappropriated securities from Daiwa and Daiwa’s customers to cover his trading losses, and (3) hid his unauthorized trades by falsifying records and lying to regulators and auditors. Iguchi’s actions resulted in a $1.1 billion loss. Daiwa notified the Federal Reserve Bank of New York about Iguchi’s confession. However, Daiwa never filed a criminal-referral form pursuant to Federal Reserve Regulation K. The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Bank (Federal Reserve) subsequently issued a notice of charges and a hearing pursuant to the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (FDIA) with respect to Daiwa. Specifically, the Federal Reserve charged Daiwa and its New York branch with engaging in unsafe and unsound practices at the New York branch by permitting Iguchi to engage in unauthorized trades and by violating prudent banking practices by inadequately separating the New York branch’s trading and back-office processes, thereby allowing Iguchi to get away with his scheme. The Federal Reserve also charged Daiwa with Regulation K, which required foreign banks that operated in the United States to notify law enforcement and the Federal Reserve about suspected criminal activity within 30 days of learning about such activity. The Federal Reserve scheduled a hearing before an administrative-law judge in order to determine whether, pursuant to the FDIA, Daiwa and its New York branch should be ordered to cease and desist from further violations and to take affirmative corrective action.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.