From our private database of 35,600+ case briefs...
In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Nikola P. Kostich
Supreme Court of Wisconsin
330 Wis. 2d 378 (2010)
In 1965, Sister Norma Giannini repeatedly molested G. K. Giannini was a friend of G. K.’s family and was G. K.’s principal and teacher at a Catholic school in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. G. K. met with attorney Nikola Kostich (defendant) twice in 1996 or 1997 to discuss a possible civil lawsuit against Giannini. G. K. shared highly confidential information with Kostich and authorized Kostich to view G. K.’s therapy records. Kostich agreed to research whether a statute of limitations barred the lawsuit. G. K. and Kostich discussed attorney fees but did not sign a retainer agreement. Kostich then declined G. K.’s case, informing G. K. that he believed the statute of limitations barred G. K.’s civil suit. In 2006, Giannini was criminally charged with two counts of indecent behavior with a child based on G. K.’s and another former student’s allegations. The criminal complaint identified G. K. as a victim, and police reports reflected that G. K referred to Kostich as G. K.’s attorney. Kostich and another attorney represented Giannini at her pretrial hearing. After learning that Kostich was representing Giannini, G. K. called Kostich and then filed a grievance against Kostich with the Office of Lawyer Regulation (plaintiff). Kostich continued to represent Giannini, and Giannini ultimately pleaded no contest to the charges. Kostich argued that representing Giannini was not a conflict of interest because Kostich had never represented G. K. A referee found that G. K. was Kostich’s former client and concluded that Kostich’s representation of Giannini clearly conflicted with G. K.’s interests. The Wisconsin Supreme Court reviewed the referee’s report.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 618,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 618,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.