In the Matter of Evanston Northwestern Healthcare Corporation

Docket No. 9315 (August 2007)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
I
From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In the Matter of Evanston Northwestern Healthcare Corporation

Federal Trade Commission
Docket No. 9315 (August 2007)

Facts

Evanston Northwestern Healthcare Corporation (ENH) (defendant) merged with Highland Park Hospital (Highland) in 2000. ENH owned two other area hospitals at the time of the merger. Four years after the deal closed, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) (plaintiff) challenged ENH’s acquisition of Highland under § 7 of the Clayton Act. Prior to and after the merger, ENH substantially raised its prices. Attorneys for ENH said documentation received as part of the Highland merger concluded that ENH was undercharging its patients. Opponents argued that ENH’s additional market power and leverage created by the merger was the impetus for the price increase. The Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) found that the merger violated the Clayton Act and ordered ENH to divest Highland.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Majorus, Chairman)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 778,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 778,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 778,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Healthcare Law

Key Terms