In the Matter of Fidelity Management & Research Company
Securities and Exchange Commission
Investment Advisers Act Release No. 2713 (2008)
- Written by Craig Scheer, JD
Facts
Fidelity Management & Research Company (FMR) was the investment adviser to the Fidelity family of mutual funds (Fidelity funds). Over a multi-year period, FMR senior executives and traders accepted approximately $1.6 million worth of travel, entertainment, and gifts (TEG) from brokerage firms that sought and obtained orders to purchase or sell securities for FMR’s advisory clients, including the Fidelity funds. The TEG included lavish trips by private jet, stays at luxury hotels, and tickets to premier sporting events and concerts. Another FMR executive, who was a prominent former Fidelity fund manager, requested tickets to two events from FMR traders who received the tickets from brokers. In addition, FMR traders sometimes steered trades to brokerage firms that employed the traders’ family members or significant others. FMR did not disclose these matters to its advisory clients, in public-disclosure documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), or to the Fidelity funds’ trustees. FMR also did not maintain sufficient controls and procedures to detect and prevent its employees’ receipt of TEG from brokers. The SEC brought an administrative proceeding against FMR for violations of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (Company Act) and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (Advisers Act).
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.