In the Matter of International Harvester Co.
Federal Trade Commission
104 F.T.C. 949 (1984)
International Harvester Co. (Harvester) (defendant) sold tractors. Harvester’s tractors sometimes experienced an engine problem where heat and pressure built up in the fuel tank. If the pressure was released suddenly, hot fuel shot into the air, causing burn injuries and fires. The problem was called fuel geysering. Harvester was aware of the fuel-geysering problem and took remedial steps beginning in 1958. Harvester sent a notice to tractor dealers describing the problem. In 1963, Harvester revised the tractor’s operating manual to warn users against removing the fuel cap while the engine was hot. The revised manuals did not mention fuel geysering specifically. Harvester issued a new warning decal in 1976, but distribution of the decal was limited. Finally, in 1979, Harvester instituted the Fuel Fire Prevention Program. The program mailed detailed information to Harvester’s customers, explaining the fuel geysering problem and recommending safety precautions. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) (plaintiff) initiated an enforcement action, alleging that Harvester’s incomplete disclosure of the fuel geysering problem violated § 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (FTC Act). The administrative law judge found that Harvester had violated the FTC Act because the nondisclosure was an unfair trade practice, and Harvester sought review by the full commission.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Douglas, C.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 723,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 723,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.