From our private database of 35,400+ case briefs...
In the Matter of J.J.J., A Minor
Alaska Supreme Court
718 P.2d 948 (1986)
J.J.J.’s biological parents were divorced in May 1982, and B.J., the biological mother, was granted custody. J.B. (plaintiff), the biological father, was ordered to pay child support. J.B. made no support payments until August 1982, when he made a single, voluntary payment after being contacted by the Child Support Enforcement Agency (CSEA). From September 1982 through March 1983, J.B. made no payments. In April and May 1983, CSEA garnished J.B.’s wages toward support arrears. J.B. paid nothing between May and October 1983. In August 1983, B.J. and S.J. (defendant), the stepfather, advised J.B. that S.J. planned to adopt J.J.J. In November 1983, J.B. made a lump-sum payment toward support arrears after being contacted by CSEA. Between May 1982 and December 1983, J.B. had practically no contact with J.J.J., but S.J. developed a close, parental relationship with J.J.J. In December 1983, S.J. filed a petition to adopt J.J.J., and J.B. refused to consent. The probate master found that J.B.’s consent was not required because he had substantially and unjustifiably failed to support J.J.J. for a period of at least one year. The probate master also found that the adoption was not in J.J.J.’s best interest because he wanted a relationship with J.B. The superior court affirmed the finding as to J.B.’s consent but reversed the finding on the child’s best interests and directed that the adoption should proceed but that J.B. should receive visitation rights. This expedited appeal followed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Moore, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 616,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 616,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,400 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.