In the Matter of Jack C. Smith, Jr.

Administrative Proceeding File No. 3-14229, Exchange Act Release No. 34-63834 (2011)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In the Matter of Jack C. Smith, Jr.

Securities and Exchange Commission
Administrative Proceeding File No. 3-14229, Exchange Act Release No. 34-63834 (2011)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

Torrey Pines Securities, Inc. (Torrey) was a broker-dealer registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) (plaintiff). Jack Smith (defendant) was the sole owner of Torrey until Dennis Keating and another individual became registered representatives and purchased interests in the firm. Smith remained the president and chief executive officer and had overall supervisory responsibility for Torrey. Torrey was headquartered in Del Mar, California. When Keating joined Torrey, he opened a branch in Corona, California, and had supervisory responsibility for the branch. According to Torrey’s written supervisory-procedures manual, Smith was responsible for establishing the firm’s supervisory policies and procedures and the systems to implement them. When Keating joined Torrey, Smith failed to establish policies and procedures to supervise Keating. Smith did not revise the manual or create other policies or procedures for Keating to be supervised reasonably at the Corona branch office. Smith delegated to the branch manager the responsibility of supervising Keating’s trading activities, but Keating himself oversaw the other daily activities of the office. No one reviewed Keating’s correspondence or telephone calls. While Keating had supervisory responsibility for the Corona office, he formed a privately held company and raised millions of dollars from friends, family, and Torrey’s customers in a private, unregistered securities offering. Keating falsely assured investors they would receive a return on their investments. Because Keating acted outside the scope of his employment, he acted as an unregistered broker-dealer in violation of § 15(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (SEA). Keating was permanently enjoined from violating the broker-dealer registration and antifraud provisions of the securities laws and barred from associating with a broker-dealer or investment adviser. Pursuant to SEA § 15(b)(6), the SEC instituted public administrative proceedings against Smith for failure to supervise, made findings, and imposed sanctions.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership