In the Matter of John B. Hoffmann and Kevin J. McCaffrey

Administrative Proceeding File No. 3-11930 (2005)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In the Matter of John B. Hoffmann and Kevin J. McCaffrey

Securities and Exchange Commission
Administrative Proceeding File No. 3-11930 (2005)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

Jack Grubman was the highest-paid research analyst at Salomon Smith Barney, Inc. (SSB) and one of the most prominent analysts on Wall Street. John Hoffmann (defendant) was SSB’s director of global equity research and a member of SSB’s management committee. Kevin McCaffrey (defendant) was a registered representative and SSB’s director of U.S. equity research. All equity-research analysts, including Grubman, reported directly to McCaffrey, and McCaffrey reported to Hoffmann. Hoffmann and McCaffrey participated in Grubman’s annual performance reviews and in determining Grubman’s salary and bonus. Grubman published false research on two companies that minimized the risk of investing in the companies, predicted substantial growth in the companies’ revenues and earnings, failed to disclose material facts, and made material misstatements. The research Grubman published on six companies violated advertising rules of the New York Stock Exchange Inc. (NYSE) and the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (NASD). All of the companies covered by Grubman’s false or violative research were SSB investment-banking clients. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) (plaintiff) filed a complaint, alleging that Grubman aided and abetted SSB’s securities-law violations. Hoffmann and McCaffrey were aware that Grubman played a significant role in attracting telecommunications companies to SSB’s investment-banking business and that Grubman’s involvement in SSB’s telecommunications investment-banking activities posed a conflict of interest. The SEC instituted public administrative proceedings against Hoffmann and McCaffrey pursuant to § 15(b)(6) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (SEA) for their failure to supervise Grubman with a view to preventing his securities-law violations, made findings, and imposed sanctions.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership