In the Matter of Kiang

Exchange Act Release No. 71824 (2014)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In the Matter of Kiang

Securities and Exchange Commission
Exchange Act Release No. 71824 (2014)

Facts

In April 2008, the chief financial officer (CFO) for L&L Energy, Inc. (L&L) resigned her post. Dickson Lee, L&L’s chief executive officer, asked a former L&L employee and director (purported ACFO) to be L&L’s acting CFO. The purported ACFO declined the offer via email. Undeterred, Lee caused the next four L&L filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) (plaintiff) to falsely state that the purported ACFO was serving as L&L’s acting CFO. Each of these SEC filings included the purported ACFO’s digital signature in which the ACFO supposedly attested, as required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX), to the accuracy of L&L’s financial statements and the appropriateness of L&L’s disclosure controls and procedures. In May 2009, after learning that L&L was misusing her name, the purported ACFO asked Shirley Kiang (defendant), an L&L director and the chair of L&L’s audit committee, to investigate what the purported ACFO described as a “serious and urgent” matter. Kiang asked Lee about the purported ACFO’s allegation, but Lee responded that the ACFO was lying because she wanted money from L&L. Kiang did not conduct any further investigation. In June 2009, the purported ACFO contacted Kiang again to ask whether Kiang had investigated the situation; this time, the purported ACFO provided Kiang with her April 2008 email rejecting Lee’s job offer. Kiang then confronted Lee, who admitted that the purported ACFO had not served as L&L’s acting CFO and that Lee caused L&L’s SEC filings to falsely claim otherwise. Lee urged Kiang not to worry about the false SEC filings because they were in the past and urged Kiang not to tell anyone about the issue because doing so would harm L&L’s reputation and cause L&L’s stock price to go down. On August 12, 2009, L&L filed its 2009 Form 10-K with the SEC, in which Lee certified that any fraud involving L&L’s management had been disclosed to L&L’s independent auditors and to L&L’s audit committee. In her role as a director and chair of the audit committee, Kiang signed the 2009 10-K, despite the fact that Kiang knew or should have known that Lee’s fraud regarding the purported ACFO was not disclosed to L&L’s independent auditors. The SEC commenced a cease-and-desist proceeding against Kiang, which Kiang offered to settle. The SEC accepted Kiang’s settlement offer.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership