In the Matter of Levenson
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Judicial Council
560 F.3d 1145 (2009)
- Written by Elliot Stern, JD
Facts
Brad Levenson (plaintiff) was an employee in the Office of the Federal Public Defender for the Central District of California (FPD). In 2008, Levenson married Tony Sears under California law, and requested that Sears—as his husband—be added as a family-member beneficiary for health benefits Levenson received as a federal employee. The request was denied on the grounds that the federal government did not recognize same-sex marriage even when the marriage was recognized by a state. Because Levenson was an employee of a federal court, his marriage to Sears was not recognized for the purpose of federal benefits. Levenson filed a complaint with the FPD, contending that this denial of benefits violated the Ninth Circuit’s Employment Dispute Resolution Plan, which expressly prohibited discrimination on the basis of sex and sexual orientation. The Judicial Council of the Ninth Circuit heard the complaint.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Reinhardt, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.