From our private database of 35,400+ case briefs...
In the Matter of Miller
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
20 A.3d 854 (N.H. 2011)
James Miller (plaintiff), a Michigan resident, and Janet Todd (defendant), a New Hampshire resident, met over the Internet, established a relationship, and had two daughters, Laurel and Lindsay. Miller and Todd never married. After Lindsay's birth, the relationship deteriorated. Miller obtained an ex parte order in a Michigan court that granted him sole legal and physical custody of both daughters. Todd was subsequently served with a Michigan custody order. Later, Todd and her parents began a steady stream of accusations against Miller, namely that he sexually abused Laurel. The accusations led to repeated physical examinations and investigations by child-protective services in Michigan and New Hampshire. Each investigation proved the accusations to be unfounded. A New Hampshire trial court issued a temporary decree awarding Miller and Todd joint legal custody of their daughters. Subsequently, Miller and Todd were evaluated by Dr. Peggie Ward, a psychologist. Dr. Ward concluded that Laurel probably had never been sexually abused by Miller or anyone else, but that Todd had misinterpreted information and heard what she wanted to hear in claiming that Miller abused Laurel. Dr. Ward also noted that Todd’s parents wholly accepted that Miller consistently was a negative influence on the children. For nearly five years, the children resided in New Hampshire with Todd, in large part because Todd frustrated the efforts of Miller to visit their daughters. The trial court held that remaining in Todd’s custody was in the children’s best interests. Miller appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Hicks, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 617,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 617,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,400 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.