Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 16,800+ case briefs...

In the Matter of Naderi

South Carolina Supreme Court
827 S.E.2d 582 (2019)


California-licensed attorney Farzad Naderi practiced law without permission in at least three states. Operating as the “Pacific National Law Center,” (PNLC) Naderi represented homeowners seeking to renegotiate their mortgages without being admitted where the borrowers lived. In 2013, South Carolina resident J.H. hired Naderi to modify his loan. One form described Naderi as a “paralegal,” but the retainer agreement said J.H. retained PNLC to provide “legal services” including “representation” and specifically listed Naderi as the contact person who could discuss J.H.’s loan with his lender. The agreement excluded litigation and required arbitration in California for refunds more than five days after signing. J.H. paid the $2995 retainer fee and provided necessary paperwork, but PNLC never obtained a loan modification. PNLC stopped returning any calls, and J.H.’s lender initiated foreclosure. J.H. had to appear unrepresented at the foreclosure hearing, then hire another attorney to file bankruptcy to save his home. J.H. testified he had struggled with his payments before hiring Naderi, but never faced foreclosure. J.H. did not know if PNLC ever even contacted his lender, and said he had been scammed and that someone should go to jail or lose their license. Meanwhile, Naderi performed similar work for residents of two more states. In 2016, Naderi stipulated to suspension of his California license with two years’ probation after Florida and Washington residents retained him to modify their loans. Again, Naderi evidently did not obtain modifications for either client. Naderi did not cooperate with South Carolina’s disciplinary investigation, did not answer charges, and was found in default. Therefore, the court deemed him to have admitted all allegations against him when entering its ruling.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 450,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 450,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 16,800 briefs, keyed to 224 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial