In the Matter of Stoll v. New York State College of Veterinary Medicine at Cornell University
New York Court of Appeals
94 N.Y.2d 162, 723 N.E.2d 65, 701 N.Y.S.2d 316 (1999)
- Written by Jennifer Flinn, JD
Facts
Cornell University was a private university that housed four statutory colleges (defendants) created by the New York legislature. These statutory colleges were operated by Cornell on behalf of the State University of New York (SUNY). The legislature gave Cornell certain administrative control over the statutory colleges, such as creating the curriculum, hiring faculty, maintenance of discipline, and creating educational policy for the colleges. Though the SUNY Board of Directors did not have operational control over the statutory colleges, it did retain some oversight. The statutory colleges were funded with state funds, and Cornell was required to consult with SUNY concerning the colleges’ financial matters and tuition. SUNY owned the property and buildings that house the statutory colleges, though Cornell assumed the daily operations. Stoll (plaintiff) filed a request with Cornell under the Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) seeking copies of any disciplinary complaints and documents related to those complaints filed by or against any administrator, professor, or student of the four statutory colleges. The statutory colleges denied the request, and Stoll filed a lawsuit to compel production. The trial court ruled that the statutory colleges were not state agencies subject to FOIL. Stoll appealed, and the appellate court reversed the trial court’s decision, finding that the statutory colleges were subject to FOIL because they were operated on behalf of SUNY, a state agency. The statutory colleges then appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kaye, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
