In the Matter of the Arctic Sunrise Arbitration (The Netherlands v. Russian Federation)
Panel of Arbitration
PCA Case No. 2014-02 (14 August 2015)

- Written by Alex Ruskell, JD
Facts
A Greenpeace ship informed Russia that it intended to protest Russia’s Arctic oil drilling by attaching a “survival capsule” to an offshore oil drilling platform within Russia’s exclusive economic zone. Greenpeace told Russia that everything would be done safely and nonviolently. Greenpeace members attempted to climb the platform and were knocked off with water cannons. Eventually, the Greenpeace ship was boarded by the Russian Coast Guard, who seized the ship and imprisoned the crew for two months on charges of hooliganism. The Greenpeace ship was flying under the flag of the Netherlands, so the Netherlands invoked the compulsory dispute-resolution procedures of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Seas. Russia refused to participate, but the Netherlands claimed that Russia had violated both the convention and customary ocean law by boarding and seizing a ship engaged in lawful protest.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.