In the Matter of the Estate of Gardiner
Kansas Court of Appeals
22 P.3d 1086 (2001)
- Written by Elliot Stern, JD
Facts
J’Noel Gardiner was born a born as a biological male named Jay N. Ball. J’Noel underwent a number of medical procedures, including sex-reassignment surgery, and took hormones to transition from a male to a female. Following the sex-reassignment surgery, J’Noel’s doctor wrote a letter stating that J’Noel should be considered a functional anatomical female. In 1994, after the medical procedures, J’Noel petitioned a Wisconsin court for a new birth certificate recording her name as J’Noel Ball and her sex as female. The court issued a new birth certificate as requested by J’Noel. J’Noel also changed other official documentation to reflect that her sex was female. In May 1998, J’Noel met a man, Marshall Gardiner, a resident of Kansas, and the two began dating. J’Noel claimed that she told Marshall about her prior history as a male in July 1998. J’Noel and Marshall were married in Kansas in September 1998. Marshall died intestate in August 1999. Marshall’s son, Joe, filed a petition to the court naming himself as Marshall’s sole heir. Joe argued that J’Noel and Marshall were not legally married because J’Noel had been born a man and under Kansas law, marriage between two men was prohibited. J’Noel responded that because she was a biological female, her marriage to Marshall was permitted under Kansas law. The district court ruled that J’Noel’s marriage to Marshall was in violation of the Kansas law. J’Noel appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gernon, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.