In the Matter of the Trustees of the Sailors’ Snug Harbor in the City of New York v. Platt
New York Supreme Court
29 A.D.2d 376 (1968)
- Written by Jody Stuart, JD
Facts
Sailors’ Snug Harbor (Sailors) (plaintiff) was a charitable organization whose main purpose was providing housing to retired seafaring men. Sailors accomplished this purpose using buildings on a tract of land located on Staten Island. The Landmarks Preservation Commission (commission) designated these buildings as a landmark. In particular, the commission determined that the buildings had a special historical and aesthetic interest and value as part of the heritage and cultural characteristics of New York City. Due to the landmark designation, these buildings could not be altered or demolished by Sailors without permission from the commission. The buildings were built at various times ranging from 1830 to 1880. Collectively, the buildings were one of the two best examples of Greek Revival architecture in the country. Sailors filed a petition to revoke the landmark designation, and the special-term court heard the proceeding. Sailors asserted that the buildings could no longer provide suitable accommodations for the older men living in them. Sailor intended to replace the buildings with more modern and adequate structures and felt that not replacing the buildings would be negligent. The special-term court granted Sailors’ petition.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Steuer, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.