Incredible Technologies, Inc. v. Virtual Technologies, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
400 F.3d 1007 (2005)
- Written by Alexander Hager-DeMyer, JD
Facts
Incredible Technologies, Inc. (IT) (plaintiff) created Golden Tee, a cabinet arcade game that allowed users to play virtual golf on imaginary courses. The game grew in popularity and was primarily purchased by bars, taverns, and arcades. Virtual Technologies, Inc., doing business as Global VR (Global VR) (defendant) took a Golden Tee game and worked to create a game similar enough to Golden Tee to allow players to switch games with ease. Global VR created PGA Tour Golf, a cabinet arcade game that allowed users to play virtual golf as current professional golfers and on computer versions of real courses. The two games used a similar control layout on the cabinet, including a trackball in the center of the panel and a small button designated for spins and shot types. The cabinets themselves were unique and featured different colors, wording, and logos. Global VR’s cabinet also advertised its affiliation with PGA and EA Sports. IT sued Global VR on several grounds, including trademark infringement for copying Golden Tee’s trade dress. IT filed for preliminary injunction against Global VR, but the district court denied the motion. IT appealed to the Seventh Circuit, which addressed the trade-dress claims.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Evans, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.