Independent School District No. 283 v. EMDH
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
960 F.3d 1073 (2020)
- Written by Alexander Hager-DeMyer, JD
Facts
EMDH (plaintiff) was a student in Independent School District No. 283 (district) (defendant) with several disabling diagnoses, including anxiety disorder, autism, agoraphobia, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). EMDH exhibited high intelligence and performed well academically in elementary school. In middle school, EMDH’s conditions caused frequent absences, required schooling in psychiatric treatment facilities, and virtual schooling at home. Due to these behavioral issues, EMDH was unenrolled from the district and institutionalized multiple times, but due to EMDH’s demonstrated intelligence, the district did not conduct a special education evaluation of EMDH until her junior year of high school. The evaluation found that EMDH did not qualify for special education, but the assessment did not include systematic observations of EMDH or functional behavioral assessments. EMDH’s family sought an independent evaluation, which recommended special education, but the district rejected the outside input. EMDH requested an administrative hearing, alleging that the district violated its evaluation requirements under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The administrative-law judge (ALJ) ruled in favor of EMDH, requiring the district to create an education program for EMDH, reimburse EMDH for the independent evaluations, and pay for compensatory education such as tutoring. The district appealed to a district court, which affirmed the ALJ’s judgment but denied the award for compensatory education. Both parties cross-appealed to the Eighth Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Erickson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 990 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.