Indian Harbor Insurance Co. v. Zucker for Liquidation Trust of Capitol Bancorp
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
860 F.3d 373 (2017)

- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
Indian Harbor Insurance Company (Indian Harbor) (plaintiff) insured Capitol Bancorp Ltd. (Capitol) and its chief officers, Joseph and Cristin Reid (defendants), under directors-and-officers (D&O) policies that excluded coverage for claims made by, on behalf of, or in the name or right of one insured party against another insured party. Upon entering Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings, Capitol became a debtor-in-possession. In that capacity, Capitol assigned all its claims to a liquidation trust formed to represent the bankruptcy estate. When Clifford Zucker (defendant), the liquidation trust’s trustee, sued the Reids for breach of fiduciary duty, Indian Harbor sued Zucker and the Reids for a declaratory judgment that the insured-versus-insured exclusion relieved Indian Harbor of liability for any resulting damages award. Neither the bankruptcy court nor the federal district court found any evidence of collusion between Capitol and Zucker or the Reids. Nevertheless, the district court held that the insured-versus-insured exclusion applied and entered judgment for Indian Harbor. Zucker and the Reids appealed to the Sixth Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Sutton, J.)
Dissent (Donald, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.