Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Indiana ex rel. Anderson v. Brand

United States Supreme Court
303 U.S. 95 (1938)


Facts

Brand (plaintiff) was a public school teacher in Indiana. In 1924, Brand signed a contract to teach in township schools and renewed the contracts and taught continuously in township schools through the 1933-1934 school year. Beginning in 1931, her contracts contained a clause directing that the Indiana Teachers’ Tenure Act of 1927 (the Act) was in full force and effect. The Act provided that teachers of five or more successive years, upon execution of another contract, became permanent teachers whose contracts continued indefinitely and could only be cancelled for just cause after a hearing. In 1933, the state amended the Act to omit township schools from its governance. Brand filed a state court action against Anderson, an Indiana school official (defendant), seeking a mandate to compel the state to continue her employment. The complaint alleged that, after a just cause hearing, Anderson notified Brand that her contract would be cancelled after the 1933-1934 school year. Anderson’s decision was affirmed by the county school superintendent. The court granted the state’s demurrer on two grounds: (1) the officials had authority to make the decision under the Act; and (2) the Act was repealed with respect to township teachers, and the repeal did not deprive Brand of a vested right or impair her rights under the United States Constitution. The Indiana State Supreme Court affirmed on the second ground. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Roberts, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Black, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.