Indiana Public Retirement System v. SAIC, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
818 F.3d 85 (2016)
SAIC, Inc. (defendant) was a government contractor. SAIC contracted with New York City to create an automated timekeeping program for city employees. SAIC’s Deputy Program Manager, Gerard Denault, subcontracted with Technodyne to staff the project. This subcontract resulted in a kickback scheme as part of which Denault was illegally paid proportionally for each hour a Technodyne employee worked on the project. Prosecutors opened a criminal investigation into Denault in December 2010. In that same month, the city and the State of New York rejected pending contracts with SAIC worth over $150 million on account of concerns over Denault’s conduct. SAIC, aware of the investigation, hired an outside firm to conduct an audit. On March 9, 2011, an audit report containing evidence of the kickback scheme was finalized. On March 25, 2011, SAIC filed a Form 10-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The filing did not contain any mention of the scheme or potential liability on account of the scheme. By May 2011, Denault and others had been charged for fraud. It was not until June 2, 2011, that SAIC filed a Form 8-K disclosing the fraud and the fact that the city planned to attempt to recoup the improper charges. The Indiana Public Retirement System (IPRS) (plaintiff) sued SAIC for securities fraud in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The district court dismissed the complaint. IPRS moved for leave to file an amended complaint. The district court denied the motion. IPRS appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Lohier, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 726,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 726,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,700 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.